Auto Service Professional

JUN 2018

Magazine for the auto service professional

Issue link: https://asp.epubxp.com/i/990689

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 5 of 69

4 A S P J u n e 2 018 S t r a i g h t T a l k T Mike Mavrigian, Editor This happens frequently, with many shops experiencing a frustrating issue with what we tend to identify as "diffi- cult" customers. A passenger car enters the shop for a reported "brake noise." Your inspection reveals badly scored front rotors, a badly rusted right rear rotor, stuck calipers, badly worn front pads and flexible brake hoses that have seen better days. You explain that the repair will require replacement of front and rear rotors, front and rear calipers, pads, hoses and a flush and bleed. You provide a written quote and the customer agrees. e parts are ordered from your local supplier and arrive within the next 20 minutes. Your technicians complete the job in a thorough and pro- fessional manner. e work was performed correctly, verified by a road test. Aer the customer plops down their credit card and pays the bill, they drive off into the sunset. Job done, right? Well, maybe. Seven days later, the same customer returns, foaming at the mouth, claiming that "a few days aer you fixed my brakes, my engine started making a screeching noise. e engine got hot and my power steering isn't working." As luck would have it, the engine's serpentine belt ten- sioner decided that was the time to fail, and the belt flopped off of its pulleys. Of course, since you touched the car, they claim it's your fault. An example of a different scenario is "a week aer you worked on my car, the ABS warning light came on for no good reason, so you must have broken something when you did my brakes." You calmly explain that the brake service had nothing at all to do with the belt issue, and no belt drive problems were appar- ent when the car was in the shop. If a problem was suspected, you would have notified the cus- tomer in order to inform them and to obtain their permission to perform the additional ser- vice. With regard to the ABS light, you plug in your scanner, and quickly determine that the right front speed sensor has sim- ply opted to fail at this time. You refer to your service records and note that the technician did per- form a scan before the vehicle le, at which time no ABS codes were present. At this point, some custom- ers are able to understand, and although upset, their initial anger directed at the shop di- minishes and they agree to have the tensioner and belt (or wheel speed sensor) replaced. ey eventually understand that the current problem was merely coincidental relative to the time line of the brake job. However, some owners (the aforementioned "difficult" or "challenging" customers) stead- fastly point the finger at you, in- sisting that "everything was fine until I brought the car to you." If the customer simply won't listen to reason, and although you might prefer to tell them to take their business elsewhere in the future, you resist the urge and you may decide to take the high road in an attempt to ap- pease them by offering a dis- count to repair the newly dis- covered problem. Cases like this are too fre- quent when dealing with vehicle owners who don't understand (or refuse to understand) any- thing about how a vehicle works. is type of customer seems to always be looking for a scape- goat in order to lay the blame anywhere except themselves or the reality that sometimes, things simply wear out or hap- pen to fail. How do you deal with this type of customer-relations chal- lenge? We welcome our readers to share their experiences and to offer solutions with regard to how you resolve this type of dispute. ■ Challenges you face with difficult customers You broke my car

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Auto Service Professional - JUN 2018